I've just ported it, please check whether it works for you. I don't quite like the code, but that's another issue... for instance, there are direct references to the class QuickSmash everywhere, instead of to self. Also, local variables are overused all the time when a single return statement would suffice.
Anyway, if it works I'm in for rewriting these pieces of not so cool code :) Cheers, 2011/8/8 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> > ok so it should not be difficult to reproduce in Smalltalk. > > On Aug 8, 2011, at 9:27 AM, Miguel Moquillon wrote: > > > I've used Quickcheck with programs in Haskell. > > IMHA it is the great tool to test codes as we describe the properties of > the code to test in terms of invariants or conditional properties. > > The tool then generates randomly 100 inputs to check the properties; we > can indicates the tool to generate more inputs. (We can also specify the > generator to use.) > > > > Mig > > > > Le 07/08/2011 22:43, Stéphane Ducasse a écrit : > >> Andrew > >> > >> First welcome :) > >> Second you should pay attention to the license of the code because GPL > is not compatible with Smalltalk in general. > >> Third why quickMash is interesting because I could not get it. > >> > >> Stef > >> > >> On Aug 7, 2011, at 10:20 PM, Andrew Pennebaker wrote: > >> > >>> Can someone help me make QuickSmash Pharo-friendly? It's a unit test > framework based on QuickCheck. > >>> > >>> QuickSmash > >>> https://github.com/mcandre/quicksmash > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> > >>> Andrew Pennebaker > >>> www.yellosoft.us > >> > >> > > > > > > > -- Bernat Romagosa.
QuickSmash.st
Description: Binary data
