Done :) 2011/8/8 Bernat Romagosa <[email protected]>
> So I see it does not work, I'm fixing it and sending it back in a while... > > > 2011/8/8 Bernat Romagosa <[email protected]> > >> I've just ported it, please check whether it works for you. >> >> I don't quite like the code, but that's another issue... for instance, >> there are direct references to the class QuickSmash everywhere, instead of >> to self. Also, local variables are overused all the time when a single >> return statement would suffice. >> >> Anyway, if it works I'm in for rewriting these pieces of not so cool code >> :) >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> 2011/8/8 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> >> >>> ok so it should not be difficult to reproduce in Smalltalk. >>> >>> On Aug 8, 2011, at 9:27 AM, Miguel Moquillon wrote: >>> >>> > I've used Quickcheck with programs in Haskell. >>> > IMHA it is the great tool to test codes as we describe the properties >>> of the code to test in terms of invariants or conditional properties. >>> > The tool then generates randomly 100 inputs to check the properties; we >>> can indicates the tool to generate more inputs. (We can also specify the >>> generator to use.) >>> > >>> > Mig >>> > >>> > Le 07/08/2011 22:43, Stéphane Ducasse a écrit : >>> >> Andrew >>> >> >>> >> First welcome :) >>> >> Second you should pay attention to the license of the code because GPL >>> is not compatible with Smalltalk in general. >>> >> Third why quickMash is interesting because I could not get it. >>> >> >>> >> Stef >>> >> >>> >> On Aug 7, 2011, at 10:20 PM, Andrew Pennebaker wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> Can someone help me make QuickSmash Pharo-friendly? It's a unit test >>> framework based on QuickCheck. >>> >>> >>> >>> QuickSmash >>> >>> https://github.com/mcandre/quicksmash >>> >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> >>> >>> Andrew Pennebaker >>> >>> www.yellosoft.us >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Bernat Romagosa. >> > > > > -- > Bernat Romagosa. > -- Bernat Romagosa.
QuickSmash.st
Description: Binary data
