So I see it does not work, I'm fixing it and sending it back in a while... 2011/8/8 Bernat Romagosa <[email protected]>
> I've just ported it, please check whether it works for you. > > I don't quite like the code, but that's another issue... for instance, > there are direct references to the class QuickSmash everywhere, instead of > to self. Also, local variables are overused all the time when a single > return statement would suffice. > > Anyway, if it works I'm in for rewriting these pieces of not so cool code > :) > > Cheers, > > > 2011/8/8 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> > >> ok so it should not be difficult to reproduce in Smalltalk. >> >> On Aug 8, 2011, at 9:27 AM, Miguel Moquillon wrote: >> >> > I've used Quickcheck with programs in Haskell. >> > IMHA it is the great tool to test codes as we describe the properties of >> the code to test in terms of invariants or conditional properties. >> > The tool then generates randomly 100 inputs to check the properties; we >> can indicates the tool to generate more inputs. (We can also specify the >> generator to use.) >> > >> > Mig >> > >> > Le 07/08/2011 22:43, Stéphane Ducasse a écrit : >> >> Andrew >> >> >> >> First welcome :) >> >> Second you should pay attention to the license of the code because GPL >> is not compatible with Smalltalk in general. >> >> Third why quickMash is interesting because I could not get it. >> >> >> >> Stef >> >> >> >> On Aug 7, 2011, at 10:20 PM, Andrew Pennebaker wrote: >> >> >> >>> Can someone help me make QuickSmash Pharo-friendly? It's a unit test >> framework based on QuickCheck. >> >>> >> >>> QuickSmash >> >>> https://github.com/mcandre/quicksmash >> >>> >> >>> Cheers, >> >>> >> >>> Andrew Pennebaker >> >>> www.yellosoft.us >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > > > -- > Bernat Romagosa. > -- Bernat Romagosa.
