So...which were the results? On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Hernán Morales Durand < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Esteban. > Thanks for clarifying. For me it doesn't need to be perfect. Answering > polls is fun actually if you know how to enjoy. > So I'm looking forward to more questions :) > Cheers, > > Hernán > > > 2012/8/22 Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> > >> Hernan, >> >> There is always room for improvement, but I think you are missing the >> point here. >> Of course, the poll is narrow (*all* polls are)... We could collect more >> data, but there is no poll without a question to answer, and here the real >> question is "what for?" What questions do you want to answer when making a >> poll. And then, when you see narrowness, I see clarity: I just have three >> questions that want answered (well, and a "hidden" one, but that's for >> later :). In fact, two of your three examples of questions were present in >> my first draft, and I removed them because they didn't provide more insight >> in *my* questions, which are pretty straightforward. Yes, I missed some >> other interesting questions for what I'm looking for, e.g. "why are you >> still using an older version of Pharo?", but well... you cannot make it >> perfect :) >> Of course, everybody has their own questions, and of course, if you want >> a "pharo census", we need to make much more questions... but that was off >> what I was looking for :) >> >> Esteban >> >> ps: yes, we can prepare a "pharo census", that can be interesting >> information too, and I would really like to have your help on preparing >> it... but lets complete this one small poll first. >> >> On Aug 22, 2012, at 6:05 AM, Hernán Morales Durand < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> 2012/8/22 Igor Stasenko <[email protected]> >> >>> or look at this form another perspective: >>> if you know how to make things better, improve them, what you waiting >>> for and not doing it in a first place? >>> >> >> I'm doing it, saying that a brief poll could be better is pushing Pharo >> developers to make things better. Don't you think so? >> >> >>> Pharo is open project after all. >>> Or at least, if you having a great idea but have no time/resources to >>> do it, why you don't proposing it or asking around who interested in >>> implementing it, but sitting there waiting to be asked .. >>> >>> >> Yes, I'd like to be asked for the right questions. Your questions tell me >> your interests much as your lack of questions. I'm proposing more accurate >> polls... like "which packages do you use often?", "which non-core >> Collection classes do you need more?", "do you use Traits?", etc. >> Nobody is obliged to answer any poll, if too many questions, you just >> don't answer :) >> >> Hernán >> >> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> Igor Stasenko. >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Hernán Morales >> Institute of Veterinary Genetics. >> National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET). >> La Plata (1900), Buenos Aires, Argentina. >> Telephone: +54 (0221) 421-1799. >> Internal: 422 >> Fax: 425-7980 or 421-1799. >> >> >> > -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
