My Metacello configuration doesn't want to load from FileTree if the monticello.meta directories are missing. This makes some sense to me as it won't be able to resolve any actual version numbers or releases. However all it can possibly do is just grab the packages from disk anyway. I saw something along the lines of Metacello new configuration: xxx; load somewhere whereas I still have my normal ConfigurationOfXXX loadBleedingEdge. But I don't have a Metacello class in my 1.4 Summer image. Do I need to get hold of this?
--- On Thu, 15/11/12, Paul DeBruicker <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Paul DeBruicker <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] FileTree queries > To: "A friendly place where any question about pharo is welcome" > <[email protected]> > Date: Thursday, 15 November, 2012, 17:25 > On 11/15/2012 09:16 AM, Chris wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've just migrated to using FileTree with SVN and am > wondering if it is > > possible to use it without the monticello.meta? You > obviously get a lot > > of merge conflicts with these and the version file in > particular, and I > > didn't really see much benefit when using SVN for > commit comments and > > revision histories and so forth so have just been > ignoring / deleting > > them. It seems to work ok for the most part and by > loading packages with > > Gofer, but I feel like I'm fighting the system a bit > and have not had > > much luck with Metacello in particular which I would > like to get working > > again. Can anyone advise? > > > > Thanks > > Chris > > > > Why not just make SVN ignore those files? > > https://sdesmedt.wordpress.com/2006/12/10/how-to-make-subversion-ignore-files-and-folders/ > >
