Thanks Dale, I'll give the Baseline stuff a go. I've only been trying to
use my old Configuration for it's dependency information and purely in a
loadBleedingEdge capacity, as it's version capabilities are obviously
redundant in this context. I'll try it with the meta back in there, but
was having some issues with the version file and conflicts on each commit.
Oh and just as an aside, it's worth pointing out that FileTree is only
compatible with SVN 1.7 (all the meta contained at the top level) as I
found when I tried it on a system with 1.6 installed :-)
Chris,
You have to have the meta data for things to work ...
Speaking of Metacello... since you are using SVN for managing our package
source, it isn't really necessary to manage the classical ConfigurationOf
(saving the mcz file versions for each commit to your SVN repo is redundant),
so in the Metacello Preview I have introduced the notion of a BaselineOf where
you only need to maintain the baseline information (no versions). The
BaselineOf can be used interchangeably with the ConfigurationOf and is much
less overhead to maintain ...
The Preview[1] is not in general release, but I use it on a daily basis for my
work (I store my code on github) and would welcome feedback on your experience
using the Preview ...
Dale
[1] https://github.com/dalehenrich/metacello-work
----- Original Message -----
| From: "CHRIS BAILEY" <[email protected]>
| To: "A friendly place where any question about pharo is welcome"
<[email protected]>
| Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 12:27:38 AM
| Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] FileTree queries
|
| My Metacello configuration doesn't want to load from FileTree if the
| monticello.meta directories are missing. This makes some sense to me
| as it won't be able to resolve any actual version numbers or
| releases. However all it can possibly do is just grab the packages
| from disk anyway. I saw something along the lines of Metacello new
| configuration: xxx; load somewhere whereas I still have my normal
| ConfigurationOfXXX loadBleedingEdge. But I don't have a Metacello
| class in my 1.4 Summer image. Do I need to get hold of this?
|
| --- On Thu, 15/11/12, Paul DeBruicker <[email protected]> wrote:
|
| > From: Paul DeBruicker <[email protected]>
| > Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] FileTree queries
| > To: "A friendly place where any question about pharo is welcome"
| > <[email protected]>
| > Date: Thursday, 15 November, 2012, 17:25
| > On 11/15/2012 09:16 AM, Chris wrote:
| > > Hi,
| > >
| > > I've just migrated to using FileTree with SVN and am
| > wondering if it is
| > > possible to use it without the monticello.meta? You
| > obviously get a lot
| > > of merge conflicts with these and the version file in
| > particular, and I
| > > didn't really see much benefit when using SVN for
| > commit comments and
| > > revision histories and so forth so have just been
| > ignoring / deleting
| > > them. It seems to work ok for the most part and by
| > loading packages with
| > > Gofer, but I feel like I'm fighting the system a bit
| > and have not had
| > > much luck with Metacello in particular which I would
| > like to get working
| > > again. Can anyone advise?
| > >
| > > Thanks
| > > Chris
| > >
| >
| > Why not just make SVN ignore those files?
| >
| >
https://sdesmedt.wordpress.com/2006/12/10/how-to-make-subversion-ignore-files-and-folders/
| >
| >
|
|
