I think the Metacello class is from the unreleased beta version. You can get it from here
Http://www.github.com/dalehenrich/metacello-work I'm not sure if it'll solve your problem or not. On Nov 16, 2012, at 2:27 AM, CHRIS BAILEY <[email protected]> wrote: > My Metacello configuration doesn't want to load from FileTree if the > monticello.meta directories are missing. This makes some sense to me as it > won't be able to resolve any actual version numbers or releases. However all > it can possibly do is just grab the packages from disk anyway. I saw > something along the lines of Metacello new configuration: xxx; load somewhere > whereas I still have my normal ConfigurationOfXXX loadBleedingEdge. But I > don't have a Metacello class in my 1.4 Summer image. Do I need to get hold of > this? > > --- On Thu, 15/11/12, Paul DeBruicker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From: Paul DeBruicker <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] FileTree queries >> To: "A friendly place where any question about pharo is welcome" >> <[email protected]> >> Date: Thursday, 15 November, 2012, 17:25 >> On 11/15/2012 09:16 AM, Chris wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've just migrated to using FileTree with SVN and am >> wondering if it is >>> possible to use it without the monticello.meta? You >> obviously get a lot >>> of merge conflicts with these and the version file in >> particular, and I >>> didn't really see much benefit when using SVN for >> commit comments and >>> revision histories and so forth so have just been >> ignoring / deleting >>> them. It seems to work ok for the most part and by >> loading packages with >>> Gofer, but I feel like I'm fighting the system a bit >> and have not had >>> much luck with Metacello in particular which I would >> like to get working >>> again. Can anyone advise? >>> >>> Thanks >>> Chris >>> >> >> Why not just make SVN ignore those files? >> >> https://sdesmedt.wordpress.com/2006/12/10/how-to-make-subversion-ignore-files-and-folders/ >> >> >
