Am 04.09.2013 um 11:43 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com>:

> 
> On Sep 4, 2013, at 10:54 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 04 Sep 2013, at 10:47, Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name> wrote:
>> 
>>> In all my other projects using zinc and RFB I didn't see the problem. But 
>>> then I don't save images in production. 
>> 
>> Images are very cool and very useful, but saving images in production is a 
>> no go, it is asking for trouble, IMHO.
> 
> yes, but preparing an image for production often includes opening RFB and 
> save it in that state :)
> 
It is a good thing to avoid that. Why? Because it is not automatically 
reproducible. If it is it might be better to put it in a start script. I let my 
images build by CI which I copy then on the target machine (in a script of 
course :) ). Then there are start scripts that e.g. start the RFB server. And 
those things always works until I save the image and change this way the 
prerequisites of the process. Or did you mean something different?

Norbert



Reply via email to