Le 23/4/15 09:05, Marcus Denker a écrit :
I do not understand how “having a modular tool in the image ” (that does not
add dependencies to anything)
makes the system less modular.
Then why the dependency Browser was not integrated? Why roassal for
drawing dependencies
and other aspects of the system? Because dependency browser as well as
roassal are really useful,
well packaged, What about pillar? Because it would be cool to have
beautiful class comments in the future. The point is how and in which
process.
In addition what are the criteria? Feelings or criteria? Oh this tool is
cool but this one less cool.
Strange for scientific people no?
I think that we should have a building process that load tools.
We will not be able to put everything in the image:
Did you look at the dependencies between RB, nautilus, history,
EyeInspector?
I did because it was getting the mess. My energy is cheap and infinite
so I can spend 8 hours
fixing configurations that nobody use or look at. But you see this
period is ***over***.
So to me it simply means that we are not serious and convinced about modularity.
But this is great, I'm reconsidering what I will do in Pharo so you give me
good indication
that I should not continue the way I was thinking. And no need to think that
I'm emotional
I'm not. I'm thinking about why hell I'm doing all this.
You always directly go and argue by “I am now sad” purely emotional level.
This is not good.
Read what you want to read. But my energy in neither cheap nor infinite
anymore.
This is not a feeling but just a mere fact.
Marcus
