Why is this "nonsense"? Are you saying it's not important to make Pharo applicable to more problem domains? Are you saying that making Pharo useful to more people in the IT community is a dumb idea?
What am I missing in terms of situational awareness? Clearly, *I am clueless*, because I don't understand what you're getting at with Wardley maps. "Strategy means making choices." Are you suggesting that you've made hard choices? Whatever those choices are, *the results speak for themselves*. The IT community at large still ignores Smalltalk. Businesses are looking to Java and JavaScript and Python and C++ /before/ they ever look to Pharo. I don't know how you can deny this. I don't know how you can tell me it's working out well for Pharo. Stephan Eggermont wrote > On 12-12-15 22:45, horrido wrote: >> Yes, the mentality of Pharo has not escaped my attention. > ... > >> Why would you want to limit the breadth of applicability of a programming >> language? Especially one that purports to be **general purpose**. > > Oh please, can you stop this nonsense? > > If you want to learn something about strategy, read the blog > I posted earlier about, and create some Wardley maps for us. > Your situational awareness is lacking. > Strategy means making choices. > > Stephan -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/PharoJVM-tp4866633p4866806.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
