Okay, the timing of my post was off. Stephan already answered my question about Wardley maps. Good answer, by the way.
horrido wrote > Why is this "nonsense"? Are you saying it's not important to make Pharo > applicable to more problem domains? Are you saying that making Pharo > useful to more people in the IT community is a dumb idea? > > What am I missing in terms of situational awareness? Clearly, * > I am clueless * > , because I don't understand what you're getting at with Wardley maps. > > "Strategy means making choices." Are you suggesting that you've made hard > choices? Whatever those choices are, * > the results speak for themselves * > . The IT community at large still ignores Smalltalk. Businesses are > looking to Java and JavaScript and Python and C++ / > before / > they ever look to Pharo. I don't know how you can deny this. I don't know > how you can tell me it's working out well for Pharo. > > Stephan Eggermont wrote >> On 12-12-15 22:45, horrido wrote: >>> Yes, the mentality of Pharo has not escaped my attention. >> ... >> >>> Why would you want to limit the breadth of applicability of a >>> programming >>> language? Especially one that purports to be **general purpose**. >> >> Oh please, can you stop this nonsense? >> >> If you want to learn something about strategy, read the blog >> I posted earlier about, and create some Wardley maps for us. >> Your situational awareness is lacking. >> Strategy means making choices. >> >> Stephan -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/PharoJVM-tp4866633p4866807.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
