hi, > On 11 Aug 2017, at 18:57, Cyril Ferlicot D. <cyril.ferli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Another step would be to get a minimal parser not relying on > PetitParser.
Let’s think differently: why not to include a tiny PetitParser? Then we can think on: - pillar sintax (better than just a restricted version) - simplify other “small parsers” that are already on the image. - we provide a tool to o cool stuff (instead relying as always in regexp, etc.) cheers, Esteban
