On 09/21/2017 09:47 AM, Ben Coman wrote:
[SNIP]
Its horses for courses. No one viewpoint fits all circumstances.
Another way to look at it is that permissive licenses give a developer
more freedom to combine libraries with different licenses.
I do like this radical simplification I bumped into...
"Another way of looking at it is that you’re picking a license based
on what you are afraid of.
* The MIT license is if you’re afraid no one will use your code;
you’re making the licensing as short and non-intimidating as possible.
* The Apache License you are somewhat afraid of no one using your
code, but you are also afraid of legal ambiguity and patent trolls.
* With the GPL licenses, you are afraid of someone else profiting from
your work [or profiting off end-users] (and ambiguity, and patent
trolls)."
[https://exygy.com/which-license-should-i-use-mit-vs-apache-vs-gpl]
...which aligns squarely with Pharo - our greater fear is people not
using it.
I think the GPL one looks right. Fear, anger, offense if someone has the
possibility of using their software and not contributing back. To me I
think it doesn't work as much as they think. It doesn't take into
account the free will of people to walk away and completely not use
their software. I personally don't even look at GPL licensed sources
unless there are none other available which is very rare. I don't want
the knowledge or understanding of that code tainting other code I write.
MIT often means, we don't care, do what you want, just don't blame us.
We don't care if you take it and use it in closed source proprietary
money making big corp software.
We don't care if you take it and use it and keep it to yourself.
We don't care ... Just don't blame us for any problems.
However, we would love your buy in on open source philosophy and
contribute back where you are able. We understand you have software
which is business critical, proprietary and can not be open sourced. We
also know that you probably have software which has no business specific
(your business) code which is releasable. And we see many, many, big and
small businesses doing so today. Close off what you must, open what you can.
I don't think most of us are afraid of no one using our code. PostgreSQL
has no such fear. SQLite which is public domain has no such fear. And we
could go on and on. Python, etc...
I personally am very much in the camp of I want people to contribute
because they want to contribute. Not because I have a stick called the
GPL. But rather because I have the carrot of all of the benefits derived
from open source software. I am carrot oriented, not stick oriented.
Jimmie
