I received this comment from someone who complained: *What about the lack of documentation? From time to time I’ve checked some SmallTalk implementations like Squeak, GNU-Smalltalk and now Pharo. Of these, only GNU-SmallTalk appears to have a free, official programming guide and core library reference that any serious programmer expects from a language.
https://www.gnu.org/software/smalltalk/manual-base/html_node/* I pointed to Pharo's documentation but then he came back with: *Then show me a link of the free, maintained reference documentation for the classes that form “the core library”, like this one for Python (https://docs.python.org/3/library/index.html)* It's true, most Smalltalks do not have a core library reference, not even VisualWorks! So what is the proper response to this complaint? Thanks. -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
