On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Steve Schveighoffer <[email protected]>wrote:
> I don't want to keep arguing this, but I feel compelled to keep > re-iterating: > > The delegate return problem is nice to solve but is *NOT* the main thing > that @property solves. One can already call the delegate using a double set > of parentheses, and it's not common to have a property that returns a > delegate. > > The main problem solved is that one cannot simply use property syntax where > it was not intended. This is the piece that is not yet implemented. > Again, I just can't justify breaking existing designs for something that's such a non-issue in practice, except in a few straw-man cases where the function in question is poorly named.
_______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
