>From your answer, it seems like a case where keeping the status quo is the
>only acceptable path for you. I don't think I can get any closer to your
>desired API without eliminating strict properties, which is not acceptable to
>me. Frankly this argument is starting to seem very trivial.
There is no sense in continuing debate.
We'll have to see what happens.
-Steve
>________________________________
>From: David Simcha <[email protected]>
>To: Steve Schveighoffer <[email protected]>; Discuss the phobos library for
>D <[email protected]>
>Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 12:03 PM
>Subject: Re: [phobos] Time to get ready for the next release
>
>
>But such a proposal adds more complexity than is justified.
>
>
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
