On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 02:24:47PM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote:
 > ... However, many developments have occured which solve many 
 > of those problems.  Low latency work in 2.5.x (and in our kernel too), 
 > and just recently some interactivity changes to make the X server and 
 > other interactive tasks get the CPU more fairly have occured.

I'm looking forward to having a Redhat kernel with those interactive
performance fixes, right now I can not afford to live on the 
bleeding edge of kernel development -- Phoebe3 is the max. risk that
I can dare right now :-)

Linus' comments about interactive performance, in the 
('"HT scheduler", sched-2.5.63-B3' LKML thread) are very interesting.
It is obvious that he has given the problem a lot of thought and
has done experiments to track down the root causes.  

PEK
---



-- 
Phoebe-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list

Reply via email to