Steve/Jim,

I did one of  my 'one pagers' for the CAPS newsletter on this last year.  
Here it is up on the website.  I couldn't find much more than Oliver did.

http://www.capsnews.org/apn2004-5.htm

Cheers,
Keith

>From: "Steven Medved" <[email protected]>
>Reply-To: Antique Phonograph List <[email protected]>
>To: "Antique Phonograph List" <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [Phono-L] HMV trademark ownership
>Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 16:00:08 -0500
>
>Hi Jim,
>
>All of my information came from Oliver's letter, he states:
>
>"I learned all this when I naively wrote to GE's present chairman 
deploring
>the fact that under GE's more than 15 years of management the HMV
>trade-mark, introduced by my grandfather, Emile, in 1900 and which 
reigned
>for a full half-century as the world's most recognized trade-mark, had 
not
>only fallen into disuse but was not even among the top 100 marques.  My 
plan
>to revitalize the marque was, obviously, not to be implemented  The HMV 
and
>RCA marques are now officially owned by RCA Trade-mark Management, a 
Thomson
>subsidiary operating out of the former Victor Records pressing plant in
>Indianapolis."
>
>Obviously until Oliver wrote the letter, he also thought GE owned the
>trademark.
>
>I am sorry to say I all of the information I have comes from the letter.
>Oliver later states that no one at Thomson knows anything about the 
history
>of the trademarks, nor of RCA or RCA Victor.  As I am ignorant of its 
recent
>history, it is easy for me to believe GE gave it up as I recently read 
in
>the paper where film studios threw out old recording and films and
>autographed items and some of these items have been rescued from land 
fills
>and dumpsters by a LA performer and collector.  From what I read in the
>letter GE had no further use for it as they were no longer making 
applicable
>products and Thomson is now in the same situation and decided to rent 
its
>use out.  Oliver's "Hidden in that contract was a clause" 
gives me the idea
>that perhaps GE was not aware it was selling the trademarks after a 15 
year
>period.
>
>I copied the from letter and tried to keep it saying what it said, and
>hopefully I did not change the meaning.  I will be happy to send you the
>letter as an attachment or a photocopy.  I learned that  marque is  n. a
>product model or type, I had never seen the word used before this way.
>
>The HMV I refer to is the Trade-Mark showing Nipper listening to the 
early
>Victor which is registered as No. 34,890.  This is what is pictured at 
the
>top right of the letter.
>
>Please let me know if I can be helpful or answer any other questions.
>
>Steve
>
>
>
> > This is a huge surprise to me.  GE no longer owns the Nipper logo? 
What
> > about the RCA logo? It would seem even harder to believe that GE 
would
> > give up the latter.  GE has always been known for keeping its 
logos and
> > trademarks, and they seldom give them up.
> >
> > Also, I was curious about your comments about GE owning the HMV 
logo.
> > My impression was that GE never owned that.  Or did you mean to 
say
> > "Nipper", rather than HMV?  My impression was always 
that RCA, HMV, and
> > maybe even Japanese Victor (JVC), may have had separate rights to 
the
> > Nipper logo.
> >
> > Jim
> >
>_______________________________________________
>Phono-L mailing list
>[email protected]
>
>Phono-L Archive
>http://www.oldcrank.org/pipermail/phono-l/


Reply via email to