No, I have no hard feelings toward the guy; I rebuilt his garbage and made it sound nice, and that's the point of our hobby. Nice is nice, yes? Accusing people of "slander" is possibly less than nice, no? Yes.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Fraser" <[email protected]> To: "Antique Phonograph List" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 3:57 AM Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Best sounding Phonograph > well, congratulations then, you finally got your money's worth by > airing it all out in a public forum. hope you feel better. > > On Apr 12, 2006, at 12:50 AM, Dan Kjeldgaard wrote: > >> No, he sent me the worst sounding junk in my experience; there are no >> apologies to be made. I have heard better soundboxes after they sat in >> cellars for 60 years. On top of that, every attempt to rectify was >> met by >> nasty cursing and disconnects. My "charity" feelings are killed when >> someone steals anything more than $50 from me; lower than that, I >> figure >> the guy needs the food. >> >> Waltrip made impossible claims, and delivered nothing more. >> Whatever success >> he had must have been by pure chance. >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Peter Fraser" <[email protected]> >> To: "Antique Phonograph List" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 3:31 AM >> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Best sounding Phonograph >> >> >>> gee, i dunno. slandering a dead guy just doesn't seem right. but >>> maybe it's ok for you, because he can't answer back. >>> >>> he had a lot of problems and he pissed off a lot of people, but he >>> also was way more dedicated to these old phonos than most of us could >>> ever afford the time to be. if you still have any wondertones, >>> suggest you pass them along to others who might appreciate them. >>> mine stay with me til i go deaf, then will be passed along to people >>> who'll cherish them as i do. why? because there won't be any more >>> coming. >> .com/oldcrank
