I can't tell you what notes the strings were originally intended to be tuned
to, obviously, but what I can do is give you some notes that might work!
How long are the strings from peg to end?  How many are there?  If the
original strings remain, how thick are they?  (For reference, the thinnest
string of an average set of acoustic guitar strings is around .012".)  Also,
do you listen to band/orchestra music more, or early folk music with a lot
of guitar?  If you listen to band music mostly, it might be good to tune the
strings to notes like A-flat, B-flat, D-flat, E-flat and F natural since
that music is played on B-flat instruments mostly; if folk music is your
taste, then E, G, A, B, and D natural would work better since those songs
are generally in keys like E Major, G Major, A Major and D Major.

Any chance you might post a picture of the part with the strings?  I could
tell you more if I had more info.  It sounds so far like the inventors might
not have had specific tunings in mind, even.  Maybe the patent might know?

Best,
Robert


----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 11:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Klingsor


>
> In a message dated 9/12/2005 8:25:38 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time,
> [email protected] writes:
>
>
> As  such, I would be very surprised if the strings didn't add a shiny,
> strange  reverb quality to certain notes coming from the horn.  The
problem,
> musically speaking, would be that the speed of the playback would need to
give  a
> musical pitch equal to the tuning of the strings -- i.e., if the strings
were
> tuned relative to A=440Hz and the record played back just a little off,
the
> strings would sound awful.  As we know, 78.26 didn't become a  universally
> observed standard until many years after the acoustic recording  era, and
even
> modern turntables are rarely dead-on (not to mention that many  lathes
weren't
> spot-on during the original recording sessions anyway), so  unless you
tuned the
> strings for each record or tuned the phonograph's speed  to the strings
for
> each record, they ain't gonna sound none too  purty.
>
> Best to all,
> Robert
>
>
> Well now Robert...that makes the most sense of all.  Tune the record  to
the
> strings...but don't try to tune the strings to the record.  After  all,
isn't
> that what the speed control is for?
> That's all good and well, but it still doesn't tell me which of the
strings
> on a Klingsor should be tuned to "A" 440 and whether it was intended to
> provide  half steps, whole steps, or octaves.  Of course, all this is
academic since
>  it probably never mattered anyway!!!!
> This is a fun discussion, but quoting Shakespeare, signifying  nothing.
> ---Art
> _______________________________________________
> Phono-L mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> Phono-L Archive
> http://www.oldcrank.org/pipermail/phono-l/
>

Reply via email to