I believe some Lamberts have a liner.  I have three black Lamberts.  One says 
Edison Bell Indestructible on the bottom, one is and IPLS French lesson, the 
third is in a red and black box that says The New Lambert and it has a liner.  
It is 5077 Fol the Rol Lol by H Bluff and has what appears to be a hard plastic 
liner.  All have raised letters.  
 
I have an Indestructible with the metal bands, 653 that also has raised 
letters.  
 
Even after all these years I have not memorized all the different cylinder 
companies.  
 
Steve



> > I'm still reading online articles. Lambert was put out of business after 
> > numerous infringement lawsuits by Edison. It's said that when Lambert 
> > finally folded (records produced 1901-1905), TAE got the patents to 
> > Lamberts' celluloid records. > > However, he didn't introduce the celluloid 
> > until 1912. This suggests to me that these "other" companies who made 
> > celluloid cylinders kind of snuck in (1908-1912 generally) while all these 
> > lawsuits were going on, and before TAE put out his first EBA. Does this 
> > sound about right? > > And how did Indestructible manage to keep making 
> > records until 1922, without TAE eating them up too? :) > > PS: I read that 
> > Lamberts were pure celluloid, no liner or metal frame. So that question is 
> > answered.> 
From [email protected]  Sun Mar 23 06:48:00 2008
From: [email protected] ([email protected])
Date: Sun Mar 23 06:48:15 2008
Subject: [Phono-L] Cylinders not Edison, but whose?/
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

 
In a message dated 3/22/2008 11:41:22 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

I  believe some Lamberts have a liner.  I have three black Lamberts.   One 
says Edison Bell Indestructible on the bottom, one is and IPLS French  lesson, 
the third is in a red and black box that says The New Lambert and it  has a 
liner.  It is 5077 Fol the Rol Lol by H Bluff and has what appears  to be a 
hard 
plastic liner.  All have raised letters.  

I  have an Indestructible with the metal bands, 653 that also has raised  
etters.  



================
   The Lamberts that have a ('cardboard')  "liner" are from  England. Their 
boxes were the red and black design with elephant. American  Lamberts (no 
matter what color) are truly hollow, except for the last  (1905) with their 
plaster 
interiors.
 
  The raised-letter rims of Albany Inds are the very first from  ca ("pre") 
Nov 1907. They mimic that style from the last US Lamberts,  although the 
"direction/orientation" of rim-imprinting is different.
 
  The interior metals rings were patented by Philpot &  Matthews.
 
Allen
 



**************Create a Home Theater Like the Pros. Watch the video on AOL 
Home.      
(http://home.aol.com/diy/home-improvement-eric-stromer?video=15?ncid=aolhom00030000000001)
From [email protected]  Sun Mar 23 09:13:17 2008
From: [email protected] (BruceY)
Date: Sun Mar 23 09:18:52 2008
Subject: [Phono-L] Columbia Long Throat Reproducer
Message-ID: <000a01c88d00$cffadda0$6401a...@user52c8f93503>

I recently acquiried a Columbia AH Graphophone. The reproducer is a long throat 
and the printing under the Micah, merely says Patented Nov. 18, 1902, other 
Patents pending, there is also a number on the back 43129 on the back and, It 
has a thumb screw, rather then a "clamp" style for the needle. Is this an early 
analyzing reproducer, or do I have something else here?

Bruce
From [email protected]  Sun Mar 23 10:09:11 2008
From: [email protected] (Jeffry Young, D.O.)
Date: Sun Mar 23 10:10:30 2008
Subject: [Phono-L] Columbia Long Throat Reproducer
In-Reply-To: <000a01c88d00$cffadda0$6401a...@user52c8f93503>
References: <000a01c88d00$cffadda0$6401a...@user52c8f93503>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

I had a very early AH, and the long throat repoducer was unmarked,
almost the size and shape of a Victor Concert reproducer. The case
however, was not knurled like the Victor. This may actually be the
earlier style of the Columbia long throat. A picture would be helpful.

Jeff
Wisconsin

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of BruceY
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2008 11:13 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Antique Phonograph List
Subject: [Phono-L] Columbia Long Throat Reproducer

I recently acquiried a Columbia AH Graphophone. The reproducer is a long
throat and the printing under the Micah, merely says Patented Nov. 18,
1902, other Patents pending, there is also a number on the back 43129 on
the back and, It has a thumb screw, rather then a "clamp" style for the
needle. Is this an early analyzing reproducer, or do I have something
else here?

Bruce
_______________________________________________
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
From [email protected]  Sun Mar 23 10:18:09 2008
From: [email protected] (Ron L'Herault)
Date: Sun Mar 23 10:30:03 2008
Subject: [Phono-L] Columbia Long Throat Reproducer
In-Reply-To: <000a01c88d00$cffadda0$6401a...@user52c8f93503>
References: <000a01c88d00$cffadda0$6401a...@user52c8f93503>
Message-ID: <001001c88d09$de59ac60$2f01a...@ronlherault>

I can't comment about the printing behind the diaphragm but Baumbach notes
in his Columbia Phonograph Companion II that the earliest versions of the
Analyzing reproducer did have a thumb screw rather than the spring clamp.

Ron L

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of BruceY
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2008 12:13 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Antique Phonograph List
Subject: [Phono-L] Columbia Long Throat Reproducer

I recently acquiried a Columbia AH Graphophone. The reproducer is a long
throat and the printing under the Micah, merely says Patented Nov. 18, 1902,
other Patents pending, there is also a number on the back 43129 on the back
and, It has a thumb screw, rather then a "clamp" style for the needle. Is
this an early analyzing reproducer, or do I have something else here?

Bruce
_______________________________________________
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org


Reply via email to