No, I want to make the thick part shorter so that the crank does not stick out of the case as far. The bonus is that by doing so, I would eliminate the ugly wear damage on the sides of the thick part. The rest of the plating on this crank looks quite good.
Ron L -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Vinyl Visions Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 2:38 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Columbia cranks. Ron, are you saying that you need to resize the thick part of the crank to match the thinner part, to make it work? > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 22:49:49 -0400 > Subject: [Phono-L] Columbia cranks. > > I have two early Columbia cranks. One is on a later BN (Champion) but it is > the wrong one. It has escutcheon wear far out on the thick part of the > shaft. If I could get the thinner part of the crank out of the thicker > diameter part, I could cut down the thick part and then put the thin part > back in (Is this making any sense). So has anyone ever had one of these two > diameter cranks come apart or have you taken one apart. Alternatively, > would anyone be willing to trade two Columbia cranks with longer large > diameter parts for a very good condition BN crank? > > Ron L > > _______________________________________________ > Phono-L mailing list > http://phono-l.org _______________________________________________ Phono-L mailing list http://phono-l.org _______________________________________________ Phono-L mailing list http://phono-l.org
