And I sincerely doubt that the finish is in its original condition. Ron L
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 8:42 AM To: Antique Phonograph List Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Amberola VI sales pitch This guy is totally off the wall ! The VI was not introduced until July of 1913, not 1912. He even confuses his entire puff piece by referring to a V toward the end of his diatribe. It is a case of engaging in total exaggerations about this VI in order to find a sucker who will jump in and buy it for the Wacky "buy it now" price, he his asking. ----- Original Message ----- From: "john robles " <john9ten@ pacbell .net> To: " phonolist " <phono-l@ oldcrank .org> Sent: Monday, February 6, 2012 2:57:14 AM Subject: [Phono-L] Amberola VI sales pitch This guy was quite a sales pitch on the Amberola VI he is selling at the following link. His dates are wrong, it is not the first table model Amberola (the Amberola V beat it by 4 months) and it has little in common with the Opera. Love hisline about "In fact, consider it a table model Opera"... Here's the link: http :// cgi . ebay .com/ ws / eBayISAPI . dll ? ViewItem &item=370552343313 John Robles _______________________________________________ Phono-L mailing list http ://phono-l.org _______________________________________________ Phono-L mailing list http://phono-l.org _______________________________________________ Phono-L mailing list http://phono-l.org
