Especially since the Edison Amberola decal is not present. John
On Feb 6, 2012, at 6:11 AM, "Ron L'Herault" <[email protected]> wrote: > And I sincerely doubt that the finish is in its original condition. > > Ron L > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of [email protected] > Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 8:42 AM > To: Antique Phonograph List > Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Amberola VI sales pitch > > This guy is totally off the wall ! The VI was not introduced until July of > 1913, not 1912. He even confuses his entire puff piece by referring to a V > toward the end of his diatribe. It is a case of engaging in total > exaggerations about this VI in order to find a sucker who will jump in and > buy it for the Wacky "buy it now" price, he his asking. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "john robles " <john9ten@ pacbell .net> > To: " phonolist " <phono-l@ oldcrank .org> > Sent: Monday, February 6, 2012 2:57:14 AM > Subject: [Phono-L] Amberola VI sales pitch > > This guy was quite a sales pitch on the Amberola VI he is selling at the > following link. His dates are wrong, it is not the first table model > Amberola (the Amberola V beat it by 4 months) and it has little in common > with the Opera. Love hisline about "In fact, consider it a table model > Opera"... > Here's the link: http :// cgi . ebay .com/ ws / eBayISAPI . dll ? ViewItem > &item=370552343313 John Robles > _______________________________________________ > Phono-L mailing list > http ://phono-l.org > _______________________________________________ > Phono-L mailing list > http://phono-l.org > > _______________________________________________ > Phono-L mailing list > http://phono-l.org _______________________________________________ Phono-L mailing list http://phono-l.org
