On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Subash Chaturanga <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Subash Chaturanga <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Hi devs, >> > >> > I have started working on implementing "face recognition" functionality >> to >> > PhotArk. >> > I added face4j version 1.5.1 (which is the latest where we can grab more >> > functionality from face4j) to photark pom. >> > But there is also 1.5.0 available. What versions PhotArk will normally >> > prefer to go ahead with for their 3rd party dependencies? latest version >> > 1.5.1 or 1.5.0 ? >> > >> >> As long as it's somewhat stable for what we want, latest and greatest is >> fine. >> >> > Great.. then I will go ahead with the latest 1.5.1, which seems good. If > needed we can shift to 1.5.0 as there won't be many deprecated methods or > any conflicts. > >
If you are already working on code, can we try to commit as often as possible, and discuss high level design on the mailing list. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
