On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Subash Chaturanga <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Luciano Resende <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Subash Chaturanga < > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > Hi devs, > >> > > >> > I have started working on implementing "face recognition" > functionality > >> to > >> > PhotArk. > >> > I added face4j version 1.5.1 (which is the latest where we can grab > more > >> > functionality from face4j) to photark pom. > >> > But there is also 1.5.0 available. What versions PhotArk will normally > >> > prefer to go ahead with for their 3rd party dependencies? latest > version > >> > 1.5.1 or 1.5.0 ? > >> > > >> > >> As long as it's somewhat stable for what we want, latest and greatest is > >> fine. > >> > >> > > Great.. then I will go ahead with the latest 1.5.1, which seems good. If > > needed we can shift to 1.5.0 as there won't be many deprecated methods or > > any conflicts. > > > > > > If you are already working on code, can we try to commit as often as > possible, and discuss high level design on the mailing list. > Sure Luciano, I will update the JIRA with the work I am doing. > > > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > -- Subash Chaturanga Department of Computer Science & Engineering University of Moratuwa Sri Lanka Blog - http://subashsdm.blogspot.com/ Twitter - http://twitter.com/subash89
