On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Avdhesh Yadav <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Subash Chaturanga <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Luciano Resende < > [email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > >> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Subash Chaturanga < > > [email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > Hi devs, > > >> > > > >> > I have started working on implementing "face recognition" > > functionality > > >> to > > >> > PhotArk. > > >> > I added face4j version 1.5.1 (which is the latest where we can grab > > more > > >> > functionality from face4j) to photark pom. > > >> > But there is also 1.5.0 available. What versions PhotArk will > normally > > >> > prefer to go ahead with for their 3rd party dependencies? latest > > version > > >> > 1.5.1 or 1.5.0 ? > > >> > > > >> > > >> As long as it's somewhat stable for what we want, latest and greatest > is > > >> fine. > > >> > > >> > > > Great.. then I will go ahead with the latest 1.5.1, which seems good. > If > > > needed we can shift to 1.5.0 as there won't be many deprecated methods > or > > > any conflicts. > > > > > > > > > > If you are already working on code, can we try to commit as often as > > possible, > > Subash for which branch you are working on code..REST is not ready yet..So > I > suppose you are working on trunk for Face recognition. > Yes, I am working on trunk. > > > and discuss high level design on the mailing list. > > > > > > > > -- > > Luciano Resende > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > -- > Avdhesh Yadav > http://www.avdheshyadav.com > http://twitter.com/yadavavdhesh > -- Subash Chaturanga Department of Computer Science & Engineering University of Moratuwa Sri Lanka Blog - http://subashsdm.blogspot.com/ Twitter - http://twitter.com/subash89
