On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 9:50:18 AM, you wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Pierre Joye wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > helly Tue Jul 29 08:10:31 2008 UTC
> >> >
> >> > Modified files:
> >> > /php-src Makefile.gcov
> >> > Log:
> >> > - Exclude bundled libs from gcov processing
> >> Why? It makes sense to keep it, for example for GD as the lib and
> >> php are well integrated.
> > I'd like the same for libmagic (very new, unknown) and timelib
> > (because it's well integrated).
> timelib, yeah unknown, yeah new, so is it us to write a test system
> for them? no!
Uhm yes - we need to support it - libmagic requires most likely a fork.
And what does it matter if there are a few more libs in here?!
> datelib, cool, great, damn well tested, so no need to test again. Or do you
> want all your libdate tests to php?
Yes, because the behavior in PHP is some times slightly different -- and
HEAD before 5_3!: http://tinyurl.com/6d2esb
http://derickrethans.nl | http://ezcomponents.org | http://xdebug.org
PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php