On Saturday 23 August 2008 21:21:16 Pierre Joye wrote: > On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 9:15 PM, Arnaud Le Blanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Saturday 23 August 2008 20:16:16 Pierre Joye wrote: > >> hi, > >> > >> >> > +# ifndef HAVE_U_INT32_T > >> >> > + typedef uint32_t u_int32_t; > >> >> > +# endif > >> >> > +#endif > >> >> > >> >> I don't understand this part. If HAVE_U_INT32_T is not defined, you > >> >> still use u_int32_t? > >> > > >> > If HAVE_U_INT32_T is not defined that means that u_int32_t is not defined. > >> > So I define u_int32_t it to uint32_t. This makes sense for me. > >> > >> It defines unint32_t not u_int32_t. The define should be HAVE_UINT32_T > >> if what you test is uint32_t. > > > > This is a typedef, not a #define ;) > > HAVE_U_INT32_T is a define or a /D (or whatever uses other compilers) :-)
Yes, but I was speaking about this line: typedef uint32_t u_int32_t; > > -- > Pierre > > http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org > Regards, Arnaud -- PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
