No plans to do anything at this point.  You can keep all your hairs in tact :)


At 17:42 3/5/2001, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>On Thu, 3 May 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> >At 17:20 3/5/2001, Cynic wrote:
> >>I very much agree with Andrei on this. Please, keep the
> >>existing functionality.
> >>
> >>Although, I'm not familiar with any issues possibly connected
> >>with this. Does it hurt anything?
> >
> >Yes, it requires adding of functions that duplicate isset()'s behavior in a
> >way that may change in the future (implementation dependent).
>Could this possible change be delayed to 4.1 ?
>As this will definately break A LOT of scripts if it's changed.

Zeev Suraski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CTO &  co-founder, Zend Technologies Ltd.

PHP Development Mailing List <>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to