Christian Stocker wrote:
> On Yesterday, Colin Viebrock wrote:
>
>
>>>I've contacted Uwe, and if he doesn't object (or respond ;) within the
>>>next day or so, I'll revert the commit in the 4_0_6 branch (leaving head
>>>alone).
>>>
>>Whoa.
>>
>>Are you saying that 4.0.6 will revert to the domxml "syntax" that was in
>>4.0.4 and previous? And that 4.0.5 will just have it's own "syntax"?
>>
>
> no, i don't think, either, that this would be a good idea. but in 4.0.5
> the "old" and the "new" syntax worked (i'm not sure what's really old and
> what's new....). so if i want to get the childrens of a root domNode
> i could write:
>
> $children = domxml_children($root); (the old method ?)
> or
> $children = $root->children; (i assume the new one...)
>
More accurately i believe:
$children = $root->children();
to
$children = $root->children;
I could be wrong though.
> in 4.0.5 both worked. in 4.0.6 only the second works, the first causes
> a segfault... and segfaults are very annoying for debugging php-code (and
> maybe some coders even don't know, where their error_log file is to look
> for segfaults...)
>
Well the commit I plan on reversing in the branch what happened during
4.0.6-dev, I got permission from Uwe, so I'll go ahead and do that.
-Sterling
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
