At 05:42 AM 11/16/2001 -0800, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > > Now all that is left is to decide :) I think we're at a deadlock. > > Who opposes this strongly? > >I don't like it, but it is not strong opposition. To me it just doesn't >read nicely at all: > > <?php=$a?> > >compare with: > > <?$php=$a?> > >or: > > <?php $php=$a?> > ><?=$a?> is maginally better because at least there is nothing to the left >of the = sign to visually confuse matters.
I see what you're saying and looking at it I agree that <?php= is actually worse than <?=. Maybe we should just stick to the status quo and whine about the fact that we introduced <?= to begin with :) Andi -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
