Björn Schotte wrote: > * Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > > I don't see the need for the 230420000th template solution in or > > for PHP, the future belongs to XML and XSL(T) anyhow. > > Web designers and pixel movers are yet too dumb to > check how XSL(T) works.
Ack. > So they prefer template > solutions like PHPLIB/IT[X], as Smarty is only usable > for programmers (and as Kris said, a template engine > should not be a full fledged turing engine). You have a point here, but you're not necessarily right. Smarty templates are more complex than IT[X]/PHPlib-style templates, but still easier than XSL, and not all designers are that dumb. I think IT[X]-style templates are more important, but I wouldn't object to having both. regards Wagner -- "Never attribute to malice what can as easily be the result of incompetence." -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
