Edin Kadribasic wrote:

>>i'm alread expecting bug reports regarding "my apache module doesn't have
>>extension xyz although i configured it ..."
>>
> 
> Come on, give our users some credit :) I think that concept of extension's
> that work only with cli shouldn't be too difficult to grasp.


have you ever spent some time reading the bug reports :(


>>i'd prefer to do the checks my way, if one wants a customized
>>CLI then he/she should explicitly configure for CLI IMHO
>>i already build different configured executables for CGI and
>>for command line use with the current CGI sapi
>>
> 
> This defeats the whole purpose of having any changes to the build. The whole
> reason for doing this was to enable building a server api and cli binaries
> at the same time. If I needed to configure and make php twice, I could just
> as well leave the build as it is.


if you want PHPs that differ in functionality, then yes, that's

what you have to do: reconfigure and recompile

wasn't the reason for having a CLI build in parallel
with the requested SAPI to use it for bootsraping and
things? or did i get something wrong here? might well
be so, haven't paid as much attention to the lists
as i should have for the last three weeks or so ... :(

 


> Anyway, I don't see a good reason why not to do it.

just go ahead, do not let me disturb you doing a great job,
just don't forget to treat readline and ncurses the same
way you do with pcntl

PS: i know who to assing the bug reports to ;)

-- 
Hartmut Holzgraefe  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.six.de  +49-711-99091-77




-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to