The only feature which would be useful towards this module is threading. If
PHP were able to thread it could handle multiple incoming sockets and
neglegate the need for IPC between child processes (where PCNTL has been
used) as it could all be handled by a common parent with shared (not
copied) variables.

Just my 2p's worth

-- 
Dan Hardiker [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
ADAM Software & Systems Engineer
First Creative Ltd

>
> I've been using it since the first API revision and it's been working
> fine  for me. (Up to and including the latest API revision.) As far as
> I'm  concerned, it's getting pretty close to losing the experimental
> tag.  (Perhaps by PHP 4.3.x or so, barring any glarring problems that
> I've not  encountered.)
>
> J
>
>
> Markus Fischer wrote:
>
>>     Hi,
>>
>>     Simple when enough people have tested it and it reaches the
>>     consensus that it's mature enough for being called stable
>>     (api doesn't change anymore, more testers, you name it).
>>
>>     - Markus
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 07:46:30PM +0200, Michael Virnstein wrote :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> as i could read in the manual, the socket functions are completely
>>> experimental.
>>> When do you think the API gets final and won't change
>>> anymore. Any comments on this are welcome.
>>>
>>> Michael
>>>
>
>
> --
> PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to