Am Thu, 23 May 2002 10:44:36 -0700 schrieb Shane Caraveo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> SOAP::Lite has the same problem, in fact with simple stuff we've done at > work it's proven to be less interoperable that PEAR::SOAP when it comes > to dealing with .Net. Python is also very lacking in the SOAP arena. > None of the scripting languages do realy well with WSDL, esp. when it > comes to XML Schema. Deitrich's NuSOAP probably does better with > WSDL/Schema than PEAR::SOAP, but I haven't tried to stress it to find out. Briefly browsing the mailing list archives for PHP SOAP (which has some great information in it, Iīd really like to see an "official" SOAP list on php.net!) I have discovered quite a neat feature: In PEAR::SOAP you need to specifically create SOAP_Value objects for all return values. In PHP SOAP itīs possible to bind a WSDL file to the service which then analyses the file and takes care of proper encoding for return values. This is extremely helpful īcause you donīt have to scratch your head anymore on how to create the SOAP_Value objects so that they match your WSDL definition (something that still causes headaches for me). Hereīs the message that I found: http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/21431/0/8578899/ Iīll probably try it out this weekend. If it works well, this would make a great addition to PEAR::SOAP. Regards, Markus -- *21st Media* | Consulting, Konzeption, Produktion für die Bereiche: Markus Wolff | Internet, Intranet, eCommerce, Content Management, Hamburg,Germany | Softwareentwicklung, 3D-Animation, Videostreaming http://21st.de | Tel. [+49](0)40/6887949-0, Fax: [+49](0)40/6887949-1 -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
