I think it makes good sense to release 4.2.3 as-is (after a short QA cycle,
that will ensure we didn't introduce any new bugs). If 4.2.3 becomes a
larger project, with more pre-requisites, I don't see it happening ("if it
will not be simple, it will simply not be").
The last time around 4.2.3 died was exactly due to this issue.
Zeev
At 16:47 17/08/2002, Dan Kalowsky wrote:
>I have to disagree, a LOT of bug fixes have gone in.
>
>Honest I can run through the list of things I think should be done, and a
>list of things that I think should be back ported. None of it is new
>functionality, all of it is fixes to bugs.
>
>And I still think the Tru64/AIX issues will need to be solved as well.
>
>On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
> > I'd really like to avoid waiting this time, though (the enemy of good is
> > better...). Even if we release 4.2.3 as it is in the branch, without any
> > further fixes, it's significantly better than 4.2.2.
> >
> > Translating this into action - my personal preference is to release the RC
> > as early as tomorrow.
> >
> > Zeev
> >
> > At 16:20 17/08/2002, Dan Kalowsky wrote:
> > >Hrm, well a lot of the fixes I've been doing have only gone to head
> > >because the belief of no 4.2.3.
> > >
> > >There are still a few outstanding bugs I'd like to see fixed before things
> > >we RC. Sfox and I (mostly her though) have been looking at the dbm_*
> > >functionality on Windows. We're questioning if it ever worked at all.
> > >
> > >I can run through a list if there is a desire to see one.
> > >
> > >On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'd like to raise the option of releasing 4.2.3 again. I believe
> that it
> > > > would be quite a while before 4.3.0 is out, and there are quite a
> few fixes
> > > > in the 4.2 branch that should make the userbase as soon as possible,
> > > > especially the Windows userbase.
> > > > I think that releasing 4.2.3 can be done within approximately one week,
> > > > with one RC, barring unexpected surprises.
> > > > Opinions?
> > > >
> > > > Zeev
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > >---------------------------------------------------------------<
> > >Dan Kalowsky "A little less conversation,
> > >http://www.deadmime.org/~dank a little more action."
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] - "A Little Less Conversation",
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] Elvis Presley
> >
>
> >---------------------------------------------------------------<
>Dan Kalowsky "A little less conversation,
>http://www.deadmime.org/~dank a little more action."
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] - "A Little Less Conversation",
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] Elvis Presley
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
