> > > Hopefully should FIG 3 pass the Core Committee can take up this question > > more effectively, but I don't know that there's a reason to bother if > > we're not even going to make quorum. > > TBH, I find this a bit scary. In fact if FIG 3's Core Committee was > already in place, there's a chance the Errata would have passed in the > current form. :-| >
Quoracy wasn't the only thing that prevented it from passing - there were still considerably more (about 3 times more) -1 votes than +1 votes. So even with just the CC voting it likely would have failed to pass. ---- I'm also interested in the alternate proposal, since the discussion leading up to the one voted down here indicated that we really didn't have any other options that didn't violate the rest of the spec itself. And since we can't revise a spec to a newer version without replacing it outright (new PSR number, deprecate current one), it didn't seem there were any other options... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/9d59e031-8ea3-482a-8e1d-2a7fe0d15508%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
