Il giorno lun 3 ott 2016 alle ore 18:44 Mark Baker <m...@lange.demon.co.uk> ha scritto:
> Not that I'm a voting member, but my $0.02 > Presenting on FIG at conferences/etc has too much potential for being > asked awkward questions about FIGDrama, putting the secretaries on the > spot, and which they cannot answer because it's too loaded and political. > Advocating for the group has benefits, but is also a two-edged sword; and I > don't believe that it should be a defined part of the role, although I also > see no reason when Secretaries shouldn't submit to conferences if they are > prepared to accept the possibility of being asked inappropriate questions > where they have to "no comment". > I beg to differ. At PHPDay, which happened right in the middle of the "PHPixieGate", the drama was initially hinted with joking intent, discussed maturely and briefly, and then quickly and completely dismissed in favor of more important topics. We are adults, we can and should be able to talk openly about any issue the group may have or have had in the past. Sweeping dust under the carpet is ultimately inconclusive, I would rather expect quite the opposite approach. Advocating for what is being done here, on the contrary, shows that after all there are passionate people committed to the mission, which is a very good answer to most of the criticisms the group receives. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to php-fig@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/CAFojS1tTYLffmAXVfc5td0jg57DBZzOez3JfN9%2BsRGV5ctv4Jw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
