Gary, A vote is unlikely right now for reasons previously stated previously in this thread by voting members and in https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/php-fig/Rf1Xfgix3Cw.
Finally, there is a general strong recommendation that whilst PSR approval > or Errata votes might take place over the next three months, we’d strongly > recommend waiting for the new structure to be implemented on the 1st > January before any other kind of vote takes place. We are now in an odd > kind of limbo state and membership votes, changes to FIG 3.0 and other > parts of bylaws or entrance votes might be best to wait until the new > structure is in place; especially seeing as the bylaws have changed how > these votes actually take place and the voting franchise, but those people > are not entirely yet in place to vote on those things. This isn’t a rule, > it's not in the bylaws and Secretaries don't have the power to stop votes, > we are simply recommending holding off on such votes to avoid confusion > over who should be voting on the different measures and debate on such > issues. > A vote being done right now would be complicated as we're going through the process of member projects still declaring if they wish to remain member projects but we don't define when this takes effect. There is no hard rule against votes on bylaw changes but it's strongly recommended against (just like the 2-week discussion on votes) due to its complication and nobody objected to implementing this as a general rule when it was suggested. There is nothing wrong however with putting this to a vote in January if those responsible for opening bylaw change votes feel it necessary then. -- Michael C FIG Secretary On 22 October 2016 at 18:18, Gary Hockin <gary.hoc...@jetbrains.com> wrote: > As a developer advocate, my job is not to be responsible for the company > website or Twitter, and I believe that an advocate's role is more of one of > promotion and interaction with customers, which I honestly do not think is > important for the role of a FIG secretary. At this point I see only Michael > speaking/blogging about the group from his own accounts, and therefore > being a developer advocate for the FIG, but I think both other secretaries > are doing a fine job despite them not submitting talks about the group. > > Could a voting member please open a vote on this PR please? > > Gary > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to php-fig@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ms > gid/php-fig/6fb7f791-df93-4e76-844c-a60c7764e3d9%40googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to php-fig@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/CAAqcDMgCtCVa7aRfRiDTUpxo96bnJ3cWssbSN0u7aLnKCShDvw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
