> Different CacheInterface instances MAY be backed by the same datastore, *but MUST be logically independent.*
The second clause seems to be needlessly restrictive and appears to be incompatible with decorators. What is the purpose of this clause? On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:10 PM Larry Garfield <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/29/2016 02:21 PM, Jordi Boggiano wrote: > > Yes PSR-16 is meant to live alongside PSR-6, so it has to be > > reasonably compatible and yes a bridge has been done > > ( > https://github.com/php-fig/simplecache/commit/13f43ba7f6d5ce37c6c115c26a5f653c2d9c1e18 > ). > > I agree it shouldn't sound like it depends on PSR-6 though. If you > > have ideas how to clarify the wording PRs are welcome :) > > > > Cheers > > I've opened a PR to clarify both the PSR-6 relationship and the "cache > is not a server" point, as they're related: > > https://github.com/php-fig/fig-standards/pull/851 > > --Larry Garfield > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/0cf7897f-1334-a7fd-21fb-5bed0e926024%40garfieldtech.com > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/CAKiSzdDLLb3kec8QnNa-q2%3DO3iS%3DVqCesnVq_Ge_Y8H9B3a_SA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
