andu wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 15:40:31 -0500 Ken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Those weird function names are taken straight from C. Blame the inventors of C. PHP is partly intended to be easy to learn for C programmers.
I'm wondering how many php users are C programmers... Can only blame the php inventors for using a bad model.
Just because you cannot understand something does not mean it's bad. Your mail arrived to this mailing list through several mail nodes writted purely in C.
- Ken
At 02:15 PM 8/16/2003 -0400, andu wrote:
I take the opportunity to express my 2 major problems I found with
php in the 2 months I've been using it. First is the naming of functions (whoever was the illiterate one who
invented them) definitely not meant to be remembered or to represent
what they actually do. It's a shame to have to fill our minds with
such garbage: strcasecmp, strchr, strcmp, strcoll, strcspn, stripos,
stristr, strspn, strstr, to take just a few. A programming language
has already its problems for not being natural, no need to make it
even more so. Second, it the array overkill.
Nevertheless, I love it.
--
Raditha Dissanayake ------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.radinks.com/sftp/ Lean and mean Secure FTP applet with Graphical User Inteface. just 150 Kilo Bytes
-- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
