> And I was pointing out that this would not be a valid test when there is
> a caching DNS on the LAN.

I also pointed out how to avoid caching issues - the comment was aimed at the 
author of the message before mine.

> Too much of the conversation and most of the attribution was stripped
> too early for this to be coherent.

Why the negativity?  A question was asked and several possible solutions were 
provided based on that original question.  All the "conversation" was relevant 

Reply via email to