Hello Michiel Sikma, Am 2010-04-21 16:35:50, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > I'd like to refrain from actually passing judgement on this issue--since I > use reply-all by default I could live with both of these settings--but I'm > still curious as to why the list is set up the way it is. > > What is the advantage of sending to the OP by default rather than the list?
Because DECENT MUA's have three options:
R) Reply to OP
G) Reply to Group
L) Reply to List
If you set Reply-To: to the list, you can not more send PM to the Poster
and you have to edit the message. This is WHY "Reply-To-List" exist.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
--
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ######################
Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux
itsyst...@tdnet France itsyst...@tdnet UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
Gesch. Michelle Konzack Gesch. Michelle Konzack
Apt. 917 (homeoffice)
50, rue de Soultz Kinzigstraße 17
67100 Strasbourg/France 77694 Kehl/Germany
Tel: +33-6-61925193 mobil Tel: +49-177-9351947 mobil
Tel: +33-9-52705884 fix
<http://www.itsystems.tamay-dogan.net/> <http://www.flexray4linux.org/>
<http://www.debian.tamay-dogan.net/> <http://www.can4linux.org/>
Jabber [email protected]
ICQ #328449886
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature
