2010/4/21 David McGlone <da...@dmcentral.net>:
> On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 14:49 +0200, Peter Lind wrote:
>> On 21 April 2010 14:38, Hans Åhlin <ahlin.h...@kronan-net.com> wrote:
>> > Why change the way that has been around for years and adopted by
>> > multiple e-mail lists?
>> > It feels like it's more problem to change the way for thousands of
>> > users just to satisfy a couple of few.
>> David was venting based on a discussion in another thread. I'm pretty
>> sure he knows about the option to reply-all - that's part of the
>> reason for venting (it sends multiple emails instead of just the one
>> needed). The optimal scenario is to: 1) be able to quickly respond to
>> the list, as that's the normal action you want to do and 2) not spam
>> people with several emails for no reason (i.e. avoid replying to the
>> OP AND the list).
> Exactly. I also feel bad for those who have to pay to download per Mb,
> GB, etc.
> It's pitiful that once I send this E-Mail, Peter and Hans both will get
> 2 of the exact messages.

Strange I only got one, but it ma be a mail server filter

> --
> Blessings,
> David M.

PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to