On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 16:12, Hans Åhlin <ahlin.h...@kronan-net.com> wrote:
> 2010/4/21 David McGlone <da...@dmcentral.net>:
>> On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 14:49 +0200, Peter Lind wrote:
>>> On 21 April 2010 14:38, Hans Åhlin <ahlin.h...@kronan-net.com> wrote:
>>> > Why change the way that has been around for years and adopted by
>>> > multiple e-mail lists?
>>> > It feels like it's more problem to change the way for thousands of
>>> > users just to satisfy a couple of few.
>>> David was venting based on a discussion in another thread. I'm pretty
>>> sure he knows about the option to reply-all - that's part of the
>>> reason for venting (it sends multiple emails instead of just the one
>>> needed). The optimal scenario is to: 1) be able to quickly respond to
>>> the list, as that's the normal action you want to do and 2) not spam
>>> people with several emails for no reason (i.e. avoid replying to the
>>> OP AND the list).
>> Exactly. I also feel bad for those who have to pay to download per Mb,
>> GB, etc.
>> It's pitiful that once I send this E-Mail, Peter and Hans both will get
>> 2 of the exact messages.
> Strange I only got one, but it ma be a mail server filter

I'll have to say that I've never received duplicate messages on any of
the nine PHP.net mailing lists I'm subscribed to either.

Daniel Egeberg

PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to