������!
PHPCoder wrote:
> application useless unless I code a "plan B" into my code; meaning I can
> just as well NOT use cookies from the start...
> "catch 22 dejavu..."
> What are the general feeling out there amongst developers about the use
> of cookies?
--snip--
> I gather that
> the "alternative" url method is not 100% the same as the cookie method
> inthat it doesn't work with IFRAMES etc. Leaving me to think that there
> will potentially be people out there that will NOT be able to use the
> application, that could lead to messy discussions between developer and
> client...
We use but one cookie, for returning user recognition. That is, the sort
of info your soft can survive without. As for passing values on the GET
channel to iframes, we do it all the time and have never seen a single
problem.
Problems with iframes are in that you consciously loose all users
working on Netscape 4 (once you have 7 interrelated iframes on a window
you cannot really expect to have 7 indipendent windows open *and* your
site still usable. Lynx people are cut out too. If you want to support
*everybody* you should work one one single page.
It's a customer's choice, obviously. Most customers do not give a damn
about minorities (and so do not want to increase budgets to develop an
alternate solution that will address a minor community).
����
��������
����
@-_=}{=_-@-_=}{=_-@-_=}{=_-@-_=}{=_-@-_=}{=_-@-_=}{=_-@-_=}{=_-@
LoRd, CaN yOu HeAr Me, LiKe I'm HeArInG yOu?
lOrD i'M sHiNiNg...
YoU kNoW I AlMoSt LoSt My MiNd, BuT nOw I'm HoMe AnD fReE
tHe TeSt, YeS iT iS
ThE tEsT, yEs It Is
tHe TeSt, YeS iT iS
ThE tEsT, yEs It Is.......
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
