At 15:22 09.11.2002, @ Edwin said:
--------------------[snip]--------------------
>True. And & IS a valid html. In fact, changing & to & is the only
>way I could pass the xhtml validator. So, it's not really a bug when the
>validator complains about the & sign...
--------------------[snip]--------------------
Right you are (and shame on me).
I just now doublechecked the RFC's - the '&' character is reserved within
HTML, it always starts a character entity, either a named or a numbered one.
So: YOU are right, the W3C Validator was right, and I was simply WRONG -
apologies for any misinformation.
--
>O Ernest E. Vogelsinger
(\) ICQ #13394035
^ http://www.vogelsinger.at/
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
