Thank you for removing it from the front page, Zeev. It needed to be done.
Based on the discussion here, I've compiled an informal count of who advocates which action: Remove the post: 13 (81.25%) ....and don't replace it: 1 (6.25%; 7.69%) ....and replace (or modify) it: 10 (62.5%; 76.92%) ....and ???: 2 (12.5%; 15.38%) Keep the post: 3 (18.75%) It looks like there's a pretty clear consensus that the post should be removed (which it was). There's also a clear consensus that it should be replaced with something since it's already been widely disseminated. I think it should cover the points Pierre proposed: A brief explanation of phpng and a note explaining why the original post was removed. I would like to add that a link to an archive of the original post that was removed should be included in that note for the sake of transparency. --Kris On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Zeev Suraski <z...@zend.com> wrote: > > I am about 99% confident you have karma; why haven't you done it? > > After 2815 days from the previous commit, I've finally committed something > new to phpweb... > > I unlinked the news entry from the homepage but for now kept it on the 2014 > archive so that whomever kept links they'd still work. > > Zeev > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >
