Hi, I have been out of the country on business and my php.net environment setup is back home on my laptop. I'm wishing there was an easy way to set up a VM + php.net mirror setup on a box so I could have done it on my client's machine, but that's a different conversation altogether.
The code was already submitted a while back for this, but there's still a few blockers for me. 1) I can commit into the website repo, but I can't commit into the ' master.php.net' repo. 2) If I'm not granted commit access to master.php.net, then I need to be able to make a Pull Request to it. The problem here is we don't have the '' master.php.net' repository on github so I can't PR against it. Can someone sort this out either my commit karma, or github repos so I can progress? Many thanks, Paul On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Eli <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd like to make the point, once again, that we are supposed to be > moving away from this system altogether :) > > For months now we've been waiting for the 'new system' that completely > removes this task from us. (In fact I've been waiting to submit my own > conference while 6-7 have come through), just because I didn't want to > add to a system that was on the verge of being removed. > > So I'll ask again. Can we get the new code pushed live that > automatically does the conferences by Joind.in? As it's the 'end goal' > anyway, it solves this issues mentioned here, and ... everyone has > already said yes. > > Eli > > > On 2/26/15 3:49 AM, Peter Cowburn wrote: > > On 26 February 2015 at 08:29, Stelian Mocanita < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Would it make sense to extend the tool so when you select CFP and > >> Conference as categories to ask for both dates and content? Right now > the > >> organisers have to return after end of CFP and provide new content and > we > >> have to update it. I do not necessarily have an issue with updating the > >> entries, but I would so love to automate this and do it once and once > only. > >> > >> Thoughts? > >> > > I think we should be having entirely separate entries for a CFP versus a > > conference announcement, rather than going back and editing a CFP entry > > once it is closed (and we've been given updated text). Conflating the > two > > types of entries doesn't make much sense, to me. > > > > > >> Stelian > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Hannes Magnusson < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:09 AM, Stelian Mocanita > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> Hello everyone, > >>>> > >>>> What would be a good way to deal with the CFP / Conference date? Most > >> if > >>>> not all of the conferences have different dates, and organisers submit > >> it > >>>> all at once. > >>>> > >>>> Is there any decent way we can work around this? Maybe add a CFP date > >>> and a > >>>> conference date to the news item? > >>> > >>> > >>> The dates definitely should be in the news entry itself - otherwise > >>> the organizers are simply being mean to the people reading the entry > >>> :/ > >>> > >>> Originally when I cared for markup it was all semantically tagged and > >>> pretty using microformats and eRDF, which exposed hCalendar entries > >>> which could be easily imported as they contained location and dates > >>> and descriptions and what not. Shame that became uncool. > >>> > >>> > >>> -Hannes > >>> > > -- > | Eli White | http://eliw.com/ | Twitter: EliW | > > >
